Is it just a token gesture, a sop to political correctness, or is the Government really interested in encouraging investment in socially responsible companies?
A law change on 1
April means that KiwiSaver providers must now disclose their policy on ethical
investment. Of course, for a fund manager, having to disclose your policy
doesn't imply that your investment funds have to be ethical. It just means that
KiwiSaver investors can see more clearly which funds are ethical and which are
not. With the recent launch of ASB's Global Sustainability KiwiSaver Fund there
are now two ethical KiwiSaver funds to choose from; the other being Asteron's
Socially Responsible Investment Share Fund.
One of the
problems with ethical investing is that the term ethical means different things
to different people. The investment statement for the ASB Global Sustainability
Fund, which invests in global shares, states that 'The fund invests in
companies that demonstrate sustainable practices and policies, recognising that
environmental, social and/or governance factors can impact a company's long term
performance'. This wide definition is not particularly useful. The Asteron
Socially Responsible Investment Share Fund's approach to ethical investing is
to exclude 'companies that are principally involved in the tobacco, alcohol,
armaments and gambling industries'. This fund invests primarily in New Zealand
companies and to a lesser extent in Australian companies. As a KiwiSaver
investor interested in ethical investing, should you invest in one of these
funds? And if so, which one?
The Asteron fund
is a good example of what is called a negatively screened fund - that is, it
excludes investments that are by its definition 'unethical'. It's a simple
investment philosophy that would exclude only a small minority of companies
involved in specific 'immoral' activities. There is nothing about this
investment philosophy, however, that would result in exclusion of companies
that have a detrimental effect on the environment, such as, for example, a
nuclear power plant or a mining company. The ASB fund, on the other hand,
appears to have what is referred to as a positive screen - that is, it seeks
out for investment those companies who have a positive effect on the
environment through sustainable practices and policies. This is likely to mean
there is a narrower choice of investment possibilities, although this will
depend on how the broadly stated policy is implemented.
Before you decide
if you should invest in one of these funds, you will need to decide whether
either of these approaches is a good match for your own personal beliefs about
what is ethical. Another consideration is how diversified you want your
investment to be. Investing only in the Asteron Socially Responsible Investment
Share Fund will mean that all your investment will be in Australasian shares,
while with the ASB Global Sustainability Share Fund, all your investment will
be in global shares. Asteron and ASB offer other funds within their KiwiSaver
range, so you can diversify your investment by spreading your contributions
across other available funds in the same range, although they may not be
ethical funds. Remember - don't have all your eggs in one basket. As far as
fund returns are concerned, there is no reason why the returns on these funds
should be any different from other share funds. How well they do will depend on
a combination of market forces and the skill of the manager.
Article by Liz
Koh, author of the book Your Money
Personality; Unlock the Secret to a Rich and Happy Life, Awa Press, March
2008
Liz Koh is a
financial adviser. Her disclosure statement can be obtained free of charge by
calling 0800 273 847.